AND XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX IMPROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS INSTALLMENT ACCOUNT NO LAST PAYMENT DATE MULTIPLE MONTHS OF CO STATUS WITHOUT UPDATED BALANCE POSSIBLE RE-AGING VIOLATION OF FCRA 605 ( C ) 3. XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX REPORTING LATE PAYMENTS AFTER ALLEGED CHARGE-OFF DATES OF LAST PAYMENT DO NOT MATCH LATE HISTORY BALANCE OF {$750.00} REMAINS AFTER CHARGE-OFF WITH NO EXPLANATION METRO 2 FIELD VIOLATIONS IN STATUS

What the CFPB Record Shows About AND XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX IMPROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS INSTALLMENT ACCOUNT NO LAST PAYMENT DATE MULTIPLE MONTHS OF CO STATUS WITHOUT UPDATED BALANCE POSSIBLE RE-AGING VIOLATION OF FCRA 605 ( C ) 3. XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX REPORTING LATE PAYMENTS AFTER ALLEGED CHARGE-OFF DATES OF LAST PAYMENT DO NOT MATCH LATE HISTORY BALANCE OF {$750.00} REMAINS AFTER CHARGE-OFF WITH NO EXPLANATION METRO 2 FIELD VIOLATIONS IN STATUS

AND XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX IMPROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS INSTALLMENT ACCOUNT NO LAST PAYMENT DATE MULTIPLE MONTHS OF CO STATUS WITHOUT UPDATED BALANCE POSSIBLE RE-AGING VIOLATION OF FCRA 605 ( C ) 3. XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX REPORTING LATE PAYMENTS AFTER ALLEGED CHARGE-OFF DATES OF LAST PAYMENT DO NOT MATCH LATE HISTORY BALANCE OF {$750.00} REMAINS AFTER CHARGE-OFF WITH NO EXPLANATION METRO 2 FIELD VIOLATIONS IN STATUS has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to THE , and the most recent logged activity is THE FOLLOW, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, AND XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX IMPROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS INSTALLMENT ACCOUNT NO LAST PAYMENT DATE MULTIPLE MONTHS OF CO STATUS WITHOUT UPDATED BALANCE POSSIBLE RE-AGING VIOLATION OF FCRA 605 ( C ) 3. XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX REPORTING LATE PAYMENTS AFTER ALLEGED CHARGE-OFF DATES OF LAST PAYMENT DO NOT MATCH LATE HISTORY BALANCE OF {$750.00} REMAINS AFTER CHARGE-OFF WITH NO EXPLANATION METRO 2 FIELD VIOLATIONS IN STATUS reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "MISSING FIELDS", and the single most common underlying issue is "DUPLICATE REPORTING".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating AND XXXX XXXX. XXXX XXXX XXXX / XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX IMPROPERLY CLASSIFIED AS INSTALLMENT ACCOUNT NO LAST PAYMENT DATE MULTIPLE MONTHS OF CO STATUS WITHOUT UPDATED BALANCE POSSIBLE RE-AGING VIOLATION OF FCRA 605 ( C ) 3. XXXX XXXX ACCOUNT # : XXXX REPORTING LATE PAYMENTS AFTER ALLEGED CHARGE-OFF DATES OF LAST PAYMENT DO NOT MATCH LATE HISTORY BALANCE OF {$750.00} REMAINS AFTER CHARGE-OFF WITH NO EXPLANATION METRO 2 FIELD VIOLATIONS IN STATUS: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.