Total complaints
1
Filed since Acco
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Acco. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since Acco
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| in violation of both the FCRA and the FDCPA. Under FDCPA 809 ( b ) | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the information must be deleted within 30 days as mandated by 611 ( a ) ( 5 ). The continuous presence of this account after several disputes demonstrates systemic negligence and lack of compliance with the reasonable reinvestigation requirement. The emotional and financial harm caused by this unlawful reporting includes damaged credit standing | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| yet no proof has been provided to establish the legitimacy of this alleged debt. Reporting a collection without validation violates FCRA 611 and 623 ( b ) | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Acco, and the most recent logged activity is Account : , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "in violation of both the FCRA and the FDCPA. Under FDCPA 809 ( b )", and the single most common underlying issue is "yet no proof has been provided to establish the legitimacy of this alleged debt. Reporting a collection without validation violates FCRA 611 and 623 ( b )".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against and the continued reporting of unverifiable accounts violates this core principle. Every piece of data reported must have documentary backing from the original creditor. If the bureau can not obtain this validation is "yet no proof has been provided to establish the legitimacy of this alleged debt. Reporting a collection without validation violates FCRA 611 and 623 ( b )" in the "in violation of both the FCRA and the FDCPA. Under FDCPA 809 ( b )" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.