Total complaints
1
Filed since In c
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since In c. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since In c
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the mortgage company defaulted on an agreement that was made to XXXX ( previous lender ) | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the Judge did not sign due to it had not been mandated back to District Court | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| they did not show up to defend themselves when ( the case XXXX went to District Court ) | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to In c, and the most recent logged activity is In conclus, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the mortgage company defaulted on an agreement that was made to XXXX ( previous lender )", and the single most common underlying issue is "they did not show up to defend themselves when ( the case XXXX went to District Court )".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against and released the case back to Bankruptcy Court ( file to prevent foreclosure-due to Kondaur Capital refusal to adhere to the modification agreement ). Kondaur claims they got the property back in Foreclosure. How could that be when the property has not been mandated back to XXXX XXXX XXXX District Court while it was still in the hands of XXXX XXXX XXXX court for several months. I attended the Foreclosure and stopped it due to the judge was reviewing the case to sign in my behalf. However is "they did not show up to defend themselves when ( the case XXXX went to District Court )" in the "the mortgage company defaulted on an agreement that was made to XXXX ( previous lender )" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.