2026 data Public-data reference. official source

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.

2 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

2 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.'s complaint history from CFPB public records. 2 consumers have filed complaints since Addi. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

2
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
0
States Active
Addi
Since

Total complaints

2

Filed since Addi

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 2

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 2 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). Rodenburg Law: 1 complaints (50.0%), resolution 0.0% Rodenburg Law 50.0% XXXX XXXX: 1 complaints (50.0%), resolution 0.0% XXXX XXXX 50.0%
  • Rodenburg Law 1 50.0% 0% relief
  • XXXX XXXX 1 50.0% 0% relief

How and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.'s 2 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
Rodenburg Law Firm included written threats of garnishing my wages and even attempting to take protected veterans benefits in clear violation of federal law and fair collection practices. They also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment relying solely on an internal affidavit signed by the plaintiff 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX included written threats of garnishing my wages and even attempting to take protected veterans benefits in clear violation of federal law and fair collection practices. They also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment relying solely on an internal affidavit signed by the plaintiff 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
despite the fact that I have raised ongoing jurisdictional objections and have received no verified contract or accounting. The firms use of affidavit-based summary judgment 2

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. has accumulated 2 consumer complaints in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 0 U.S. states. Of those submissions, 2 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Addi, and the most recent logged activity is Additional, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "Rodenburg Law Firm included written threats of garnishing my wages and even attempting to take protected veterans benefits in clear violation of federal law and fair collection practices. They also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment relying solely on an internal affidavit signed by the plaintiff", and the single most common underlying issue is "despite the fact that I have raised ongoing jurisdictional objections and have received no verified contract or accounting. The firms use of affidavit-based summary judgment".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. have?

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. has received 2 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. respond to complaints on time?

and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial.?

The most common issue reported against and procedurally abusive. I view these tactics as an attempt to intimidate and deprive me of my right to a fair trial. is "despite the fact that I have raised ongoing jurisdictional objections and have received no verified contract or accounting. The firms use of affidavit-based summary judgment" in the "Rodenburg Law Firm included written threats of garnishing my wages and even attempting to take protected veterans benefits in clear violation of federal law and fair collection practices. They also filed a Motion for Summary Judgment relying solely on an internal affidavit signed by the plaintiff" product category.

Related