and outright lies : XXXX XXXX Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm XXXX that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call

What the CFPB Record Shows About and outright lies : XXXX XXXX Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm XXXX that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call

and outright lies : XXXX XXXX Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm XXXX that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to CFPB, and the most recent logged activity is CFPB Compl, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, and outright lies : XXXX XXXX Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm XXXX that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "which have been totally contradicted by Respondent -- as well as my complaints about being unable to reach their so-called XXXX banking department ''", and the single most common underlying issue is "and serious complaints about their so-called chat customer service '' function which is a total joke".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating and outright lies : XXXX XXXX Synchrony Bank was informed by me on XX/XX/XXXX at XXXX pm XXXX that my XXXX phone number was no longer valid and should never be used to send security codes or other account confirmation information. During that same call: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.