2026 data Public-data reference. official source

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since An i. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
An i
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since An i

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). i.e. US: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% i.e. US 100.0%
  • i.e. US 1 100.0% 0% relief

How a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
i.e. US Bank 1

Top States

State Complaints
USBank sold the alleged {$1000.00} debt to XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX prior to the XXXX USBank adjustment and tax benefits of write-off which disallows them from collection since it is first no longer their debt and secondarily a debt that is settled with any originating account. XXXX XXXX # XXXX. In the instance that this particular collection agency removed the funds on behalf of US Bank as a vendor or an agent it was illegal also because there is no judgment issued by the court against me the other party. This particular transaction that is listed as an adjustment from US Bank and any other entities that remove the money from my account have broken multiple different laws.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,U.S. BANCORP,MN,55429,Servicemember,Consent provided,Web,2023-03-02,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,6529847 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
it must correct the error within one business day and report the results to the consumer within three business days 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to An i, and the most recent logged activity is An institu, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "i.e. US Bank", and the single most common underlying issue is "it must correct the error within one business day and report the results to the consumer within three business days".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore have?

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore respond to complaints on time?

a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore?

The most common issue reported against a theft. On XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX testified clearly that she was not from the fraud department she was the branch manager for that particular location and that she found no reason why she will give me the money back even though she invited violated Federal banking law. Furthermore is "it must correct the error within one business day and report the results to the consumer within three business days" in the "i.e. US Bank" product category.

Related