Total complaints
1
Filed since Acco
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since Acco. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
Acco
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture complaint mix by product
- a tenant 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| a tenant is not responsible for normal wear and tear to the walls and floor. Normal wear and tear which is defined as moderate scuffs | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| which is evident by the pictures attached. Also note the dates of the pictures. Also please see attached California rental guidelines page XXXX. After two years there should be no deduction for painting. Please review the history of my occupancy at XXXX. I was there longer than 3 years I should not be responsible for the painting of a property. | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| nicks | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture
a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to Acco, and the most recent logged activity is According , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "a tenant is not responsible for normal wear and tear to the walls and floor. Normal wear and tear which is defined as moderate scuffs", and the single most common underlying issue is "nicks".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture have?
a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture respond to complaints on time?
a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture?
The most common issue reported against a tenant who has lived in a rental unit longer than two years would not be charged for the cost of repainting for normal wear and tear. This falls under the responsibility of XXXX/XXXX. I lived in the apartment for 3 years and 8 months. Charging me for this is violating the law. I never even hanged a picture is "nicks" in the "a tenant is not responsible for normal wear and tear to the walls and floor. Normal wear and tear which is defined as moderate scuffs" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
