2026 data Public-data reference. official source

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent

1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.

1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB

This profile shows a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XXXX. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.

1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
XXXX
Since

Total complaints

1

Filed since XXXX

Timely response

0%

CFPB-tracked response window

Relief rate

0%

Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief

Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark

CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.

Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median

Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent complaint mix by product

Total complaints: 1

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent complaint mix by product Horizontal strip chart. Width of each segment is proportional to that category's share of the 1 total complaints. Trend arrow shows rolling 12-month direction. Inline badge shows resolution rate (% closed with relief). PR XXXX: 1 complaints (100.0%), resolution 0.0% PR XXXX 100.0%
  • PR XXXX 1 100.0% 0% relief

How a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.

Complaints by Product

Product Complaints
PR XXXX Re : FOURTH NOTICE OF TILA RESCISSION ENFORCEMENT AND FORMAL DEMAND Borrowers : XXXX XXXX XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Loan No. : XXXX | Property : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1

Top States

State Complaints
rescission was effective upon notice ; the note and mortgage became void by law operation 1

Top Issues

Issue Complaints
correspondence and serves as my Fourth Formal Notice to enforce rescission and to demand immediate cancellation of the mortgage lien XXXX As explained below 1

Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database

What the CFPB Record Shows About a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XXXX, and the most recent logged activity is XXXX XXXX , giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.

Looking at response behavior, a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "PR XXXX Re : FOURTH NOTICE OF TILA RESCISSION ENFORCEMENT AND FORMAL DEMAND Borrowers : XXXX XXXX XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Loan No. : XXXX | Property : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX", and the single most common underlying issue is "correspondence and serves as my Fourth Formal Notice to enforce rescission and to demand immediate cancellation of the mortgage lien XXXX As explained below".

Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.

Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.

Frequently Asked Questions

How many CFPB complaints does a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent have?

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.

Does a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent respond to complaints on time?

a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.

What is the most common complaint about a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent?

The most common issue reported against a refinancing that triggered the Truth in Lending Act ( TILA ) disclosure and rescission regime. I timely exercised rescission in XXXX. Under binding precedent is "correspondence and serves as my Fourth Formal Notice to enforce rescission and to demand immediate cancellation of the mortgage lien XXXX As explained below" in the "PR XXXX Re : FOURTH NOTICE OF TILA RESCISSION ENFORCEMENT AND FORMAL DEMAND Borrowers : XXXX XXXX XXXX & XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Loan No. : XXXX | Property : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX" product category.

Related