Total complaints
1
Filed since XX/X
2026 data Public-data reference. official source
a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since XX/X. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
1
Total Complaints
0%
Timely Response
0%
Disputed
0%
Relief Provided
1
States Active
XX/X
Since
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
Timely response rate 0.0%
Federal benchmark
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Relief rate 0.0%
Industry median
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made complaint mix by product
- I probed 1 100.0% – 0% relief
How a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
Complaints by Product
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| I probed on Chase 's logic which concluded I'd received benefit from the transaction. This representative claimed that USUALLY chip read transactions are not fraudulent. I confirmed with the representative that while it may be unusual | 1 |
Top States
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| did not have any additional information beyond the name of the vendor. This representative offered to re-open /appeal the case on my behalf. She informed me that the review / appeal would take XXXX business days | 1 |
Top Issues
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| explained that I had been at XXXX where the bar tab was opened. The representative was able to recognize the legitimate transactions from the bar. Out of curiosity | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
What the CFPB Record Shows About a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made
a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to XX/X, and the most recent logged activity is XX/XX/XXXX, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "I probed on Chase 's logic which concluded I'd received benefit from the transaction. This representative claimed that USUALLY chip read transactions are not fraudulent. I confirmed with the representative that while it may be unusual", and the single most common underlying issue is "explained that I had been at XXXX where the bar tab was opened. The representative was able to recognize the legitimate transactions from the bar. Out of curiosity".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Consumer Guides
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Related Data
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
PlainBankData
Bank financial data — deposits, assets, branches, and regulatory filings for FDIC-insured institutions.
PlainAdvisorCheck
Financial advisor records — SEC and FINRA registration, disclosures, and disciplinary history.
PlainCU
Credit union data — financial performance, membership, rates, and NCUA regulatory information.
PlainInsurer
Insurance company data — financial strength, complaint ratios, market share, and state licensing.
PlainLender
Mortgage lender data — HMDA loan originations, approval rates, interest rates, and lending patterns.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
Frequently Asked Questions
How many CFPB complaints does a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made have?
a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
Does a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made respond to complaints on time?
a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
What is the most common complaint about a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made?
The most common issue reported against a random vendor where the fraudulent charge was made is "explained that I had been at XXXX where the bar tab was opened. The representative was able to recognize the legitimate transactions from the bar. Out of curiosity" in the "I probed on Chase 's logic which concluded I'd received benefit from the transaction. This representative claimed that USUALLY chip read transactions are not fraudulent. I confirmed with the representative that while it may be unusual" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.
Related
