Total complaints
1
Filed since If t
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows 147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since If t. The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since If t
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How 147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the bank may be liable for any loss resulting from the delay.XXXX The right of chargeback is not affected by the customers use of any credit given for the item or the failure of the bank to exercise ordinary care with respect to the item.XXXX UCC 4214 ( d ) ( 1 ) and ( 2 ). Although retaining its right to charge back | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX. Drew v. Commerce Bank | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| who was bilked in a XXXX ( counterfeit ) official check scam | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 0 include a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to If t, and the most recent logged activity is If the ret, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, 147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "the bank may be liable for any loss resulting from the delay.XXXX The right of chargeback is not affected by the customers use of any credit given for the item or the failure of the bank to exercise ordinary care with respect to the item.XXXX UCC 4214 ( d ) ( 1 ) and ( 2 ). Although retaining its right to charge back", and the single most common underlying issue is "who was bilked in a XXXX ( counterfeit ) official check scam".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating 147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against 147 P.3d 185 ( Mont. 2006 ) ( counterfeit official checks described as good and the same as cash ). See also Call v. Ellenville Natl Bank is "who was bilked in a XXXX ( counterfeit ) official check scam" in the "the bank may be liable for any loss resulting from the delay.XXXX The right of chargeback is not affected by the customers use of any credit given for the item or the failure of the bank to exercise ordinary care with respect to the item.XXXX UCC 4214 ( d ) ( 1 ) and ( 2 ). Although retaining its right to charge back" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.