Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
{$3500.00} 3
{$3500.00} In addition to these accounts being fraud they are ILLEGALLY being reported past the 7 year statutory reporting period.,,EQUIFAX 1
{$3500.00} In addition to these accounts being fraud they are ILLEGALLY being reported past the 7 year statutory reporting period.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,MD,217XX,,Consent provided,Web,2018-04-27,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,2888978 1
{$36.00} {$98.00} ( XX/XX/year> ) {$84.00} {$53.00} ( XX/XX/year> ) charges related to XXXX XXXX XXXX and Restaurant. On to the next 1
{$360.00} XXXX 1
{$3700.00} 1
{$3700.00} XXXX XXXX 1
{$380.00} 1
{$380.00} has been applied/paid to the attorney based on the statements you sent me and those of the Trustee. Please tell me what is the status of the attorneys fees? 1
{$3800.00} 6
{$3800.00} currently on my credit reports 1
{$3800.00} more than on the contract. My principle paid off is only {$9500.00} in 5 years. I have paid {$22000.00} on the loan 1
{$38000.00} past due Issue : Excessive balance reporting and prolonged charge-off status without resolution XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Account ending in XXXX ) Status : Paid 1
{$39.00} 1
{$4.00} 1
{$4.00} ( XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX ) 1
{$4.00} in Penn Credit 's own personal fees 1
{$400.00} 1
{$400.00}. 1
{$4000.00} 1
{$4000.00} for a total of {$6000.00} 1
{$4000.00}. '' I believe that I'm affected and I have NOT received {$4000.00}. 1
{$420.00} 1
{$420.00} Acct # : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
{$420.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
{$43.00} ) Total {$340.00} Total of unauthorized withdrawals : {$3700.00} Total of fees : {$110.00} TOTAL UNAUTHORIZED Withdrawals and Fees {$3800.00},Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Netspend Corporation,FL,324XX,,Consent provided,Web,2025-02-25,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,12127325 1
{$43.00} per month and {$54.00} per month in XXXX. They sent a second letter denying the appeal on XX/XX/XXXX. Please assist me in getting my money back. This may include other seniors. The merchant was also contacted on XX/XX/XXXX. They confirmed no services was rendered but the sales were authorized because they have all my information. They said they would send proof but none was received from them or the bank.,,Comerica,NY,105XX,Older American,Consent provided,Web,2026-01-20,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,18616291 1
{$44000.00} AND {$2600.00} XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX {$3900.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} -- -- -- EDU XXXX {$0.00} PAID CHGOFF XXXX XXXX Remarks : ACCOUNT PAID FOR LESS THAN FULL BALANCE ; PAID CHARGE OFF ; DISPUTE RESOLVED - CUSTOMER DISAGREES XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX {$4800.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} -- -- -- EDU XXXX {$0.00} PAID CHGOFF XXXX XXXX Remarks : ACCOUNT PAID FOR LESS THAN FULL BALANCE ; PAID CHARGE OFF ; DISPUTE RESOLVED - CUSTOMER DISAGREES XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX XXXX {$2600.00} {$0.00} {$0.00} -- -- -- XXXX XXXX {$0.00} PAID CHGOFF XXXX XXXX Remarks : ACCOUNT PAID FOR LESS THAN FULL BALANCE ; PAID CHARGE OFF ; DISPUTE RESOLVED - CUSTOMER DISAGREES 4. XXXX This account was paid in full. They should not be reporting a charge off. 1
{$450.00}. On XXXX XXXX 1
{$4500.00} 3
{$4500.00} and {$4500.00} i.e. a total of {$16000.00} where send as direct deposit to my personal account ( I never gave my bank details to my school or loan processor ) which I NEVER RECEIVED and the school or the loan servicer ( XXXX XXXX ) does not have any information about the direct deposit refund 1
{$460.00} These violations have caused numerous injuries to my life. Under the Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 ( HIPAA ) 1
{$47.00} ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 1
{$47.00} {$38.00} {$44.00} {$60.00} {$50.00} {$47.00} {$50.00} XX/XX/XXXX AND I STILL HAD THEM AND I HAVE CHARGED FEE UNNECESSARY AND A DISORDER IN THE PAYMENTS MY STATEMENT HAS TWO CYCLES OF PAYMENTS ONE ON THE XXXX OF EACH MONTH AND THE XXXX OF THE SAME MONTH THERE IS A DISORDER WITH MY BILL OR IT IS I HAVE TO PAY IN 1 MONTH 2 TIMES EACH MONTH AND CREDIT LINE .... IT DOES NOT KEEP ALWAYS LOW WITH FEE OF {$35.00} THEN GO UP WITH PAYMENTS 1
{$470.00} now ). Because of the XXXX 1
{$470.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
{$4700.00} 3
{$480.00} 1
{$4800.00} 1
{$4800.00} ) and Dates ( XXXX ) All reporting Late Payments XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Charge Off ( High Balance {$540.00} 1
{$49.00} 1
{$490.00} balance Hughes Finance XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Charged-off account 1
{$490.00} fee 1
{$5.00} and {$3.00} charges I disputed erroneously. I agreed that that was fair. Later that night I received a notification that my account was overdrawn. I reviewed my account on my cellphone and was shocked that the entire credit I received on XX/XX/XXXX! I called and after waiting several hours on hold 1
{$50.00} 1
{$50.00} energy audit fee 1
{$50.00} is actually 4 % annually 1
{$500.00} 3
{$500.00} costs 2
{$500.00} on XX/XX/XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.