Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$450.00} XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Balance : {$2600.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$53000.00} 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$760.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$950.00} 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$13000.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$130000.00} XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$110000.00} XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$240.00} XXXX XXXX ( Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance Owed : {$630.00}.,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$0.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$790.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$6200.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$3700.00} XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$530.00} XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$730.00},,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$200.00} 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$200.00}XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance Owed : {$2500.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance XXXX {$1600.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance {$140.00} Balance updated XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Bank Closed 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX based on Equifax ( due to recent payment history ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX by ensuring consumers were given credit terms and rates but would not show I paid the balance nor refund me the amount I overpaid. That in itself was an admittance that American First Finance required corrective action but they still were unwilling to refund my overpayment nor rescind their efforts to seek further payments for over {$1600.00}.,,American First Finance 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX California 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX CLOSED ACCOUNTS 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX complaints for XXXX. The letters that I have received from Nelnet that state they would update the consumer data are a joke. Those letters can be interpreted in several ways. What it sounds like to me is that they know they messed up and did not want to fully admit it. Maybe this is why Nelnet has so many lawsuits. Incorrectly reporting payments 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX consumer 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX contact info:XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Correct Legal Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX Consumer Note : This variation has never been associated with my identity and is creating unnecessary risk of misidentification. I have enclosed a copy of my government-issued ID to verify my correct legal name. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/2023 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXX 7
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date of Inquiry XX/XX/XXXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXXXXXXX Date XXXX XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$20000.00} 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$2800.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$460.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date Opened XX/XX/XXXX Balance {$5600.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Date XXXX : XX/XX/XXXX Balance : {$11000.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX dated on XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX days a week. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Department XXXX MoneyGram XXXX Mailing Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX MoneyGram XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX do n't understand 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ending XXXX I have been a customer since XXXX and do not believe permanently closing my account is warranted when I did not receive any communication on needing to verify my personal information in XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX established that the FDCPA applies to the activities of debt collectors 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX established that the FDCPA applies to the activities of debt XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX FL XXXX XXXX XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has any rights to collect debt or harrass people in the state of Georgia. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has demonstrated a disregard for these legal obligations. Accuracy of Consumer Reports ( 15 U.S.C. 1681e ) : Consumer reporting agencies must maintain reasonable procedures to ensure the maximum possible accuracy of the information in consumer reports. The re-furnishing of previously disputed and unverified information by XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX is a blatant violation of this requirement 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has shared my information with these entities regularly over the course of decadeson both daily and monthly schedules. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has violated my rights. 4
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX has yet to provide receipts 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I also called and they found me however 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX I reviewed my Transunion report on XX/XX/year> and noticed some things are incomplete and not accurate. And according to the fair credit reporting act 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Incorrect Employers : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Violations : FCRA 1681e ( b ) MCPA 445.903 : Misrepresentation through false data Request : REMOVE ALL INACCURATE PERSONAL DATA IMMEDIATELY. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX indicated my correct address on every page 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX Inquired on XXXX XXXX 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX,,EQUIFAX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,TRANSUNION INTERMEDIATE HOLDINGS 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Inquired on XXXX XXXX 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.