Browse Companies

Explore all 145.5K companies with CFPB consumer complaints

Company Complaints
XXXX XXXX XXXX opened XXXX Please remove this from my report. In accordance with the Fair Credit Reporting Act 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX opened XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX opened XXXX XXXX under account XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX Operations XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX of Compliance XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX or XXXX Bank for any of these companies to be able to claim any debt against me. Let me be perfectly clear 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX acct. # XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Original Creditor : XXXX XXXX XXXX ) XXXX Balance : {$5500.00} 4
XXXX XXXX XXXX Original XXXX XXXX XXXX BANK XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$240.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Original XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Balance : {$240.00} 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX PA XXXX ) He notice several instances where Equifax are in non-compliance with the FCRA. Im a victim but yet Im treated as if Im nothing. Equifax continues to report Fraudulent accounts and inquiries to my credit report and I want it to stop Immediately! Please note that I have already opted out of arbitration and have supporting documents and proof to support all my claims. I am sure that Equifax did not go through the original furnisher to verify these accounts are mine and they have to do so under the FCRA.If they did verify 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX Phone : XXXX. I do not know any of these people and have never done any business with them. If this his is how XXXX Hospital handles patients private and confidential information it really is a disgrace.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,Kriya Capital 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Phone Bills 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX previously submitted a written dispute and validation request to XXXX regarding the account listed as XXXX on my credit report. In that letter 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Properties ( mobile XXXX ) nor to me. This is obvious a second attempt of CONSPIRACY to defraud me dating back to ( XX/XX/2022 ) compelled me to file this Compliant if not resolved I will escalate of all Parties involved : XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX provided a copy of a check for {$32000.00} that it sent to Ally on XX/XX/XXXX. It was at this time we realized that 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX provides XXXX response to the 1st demand letter dated XX/XX/XXXX XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX providing the chain of events and our demand for our money back. XXXX XXXX agreed with our concerns and advised XXXX XXXX and XXXX XXXX to return our funds. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Remove all these version of address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX removed the account from the other two credit bureaus 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Report once the corrections have been made. 13
XXXX XXXX XXXX reported account tradeline and Discharge in Bankruptcy 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX reps fail to disclose their full names and location 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Requested Relief from the CFPB : Immediate enforcement of removal and permanent blocking of all fraudulent and inaccurate accounts listed. 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX responded they were not able to produce the information I requested 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX SC 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX SD XXXX - XX/XX/XXXX : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX SEC # XXXX DOB XXXX/XXXX/XXXX ADDRESS XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX see File 1 - personal letters pages 1 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Self-Reported ( XXXX XXXX XXXX ) ** Violates FCRA 607 ( b ) 3
XXXX XXXX XXXX sent me a letter dated XX/XX/XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX sent me another letter 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX services ( no response from people they contacted ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX shareholder since XX/XX/XXXX was never informed that the loan I obtained from The XXXX XXXX XXXX in XX/XX/XXXX was assigned to XXXX XXXX and that the financial institutions were only servicing the loan. There is no record that XXXX XXXX ever filed for a XXXX yet in XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX indicates that they obtained the loan from XXXX XXXX and therefore filed for a XXXX. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX shareholder since XXXX was never informed that the loan I obtained from The XXXX XXXX XXXX in XXXX was assigned to XXXX XXXX and that the financial institutions were only servicing the loan. There is no record that XXXX XXXX ever filed for a XXXX yet in XX/XX/XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX indicates that they obtained the loan from XXXX XXXX and therefore filed for a XXXX. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX signed a contract with the U.S. Treasury Department agreeing to participate in HAMP - a program through which XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX sold our properties to Business 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX SORT CODE : XXXX Do send wire copies accordingly for confirmation. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Status Updated date was ( XX/XX/XXXX ) 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX Subject : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX US Bank XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX sworn affidavit recorded in XXXX XXXX Property records which shows the legal descriptive fictitious name asserted as true under the statutory requirement of the State of Georgia 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX that is listed twice 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX The Privacy Act as initially enacted did not generally protect non-resident foreign nationals. See 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX The trickery of a LIFT OF STAY. How can a judge approve a lift of stay KNOWING THEIR WAS FRAUD AND AN INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED. DO THEY REALLY THINK WE ARE STUPID? TO TOP IT OFF EACH HOME HAD A RECORDED LIS PENDENS ' ATTACHED TO EACH. IF WE HAD OR RECEIVED A LOAN THE LIS PENDENS NONE OF THE HOMES COULD NOT BE SOLD UNTIL THE LIS PENDENS WAS SATISFIED. THE HOMES WAS STOLEN PRIOR TO MY WIFE 'S DISCHARGE XX/XX/2022 ( WHICH IS MY B-DAY ). I THINK THE XXXX WAS ATTEMPTING TO BE HUMOROUS. GIVEN THE EVIDENCE VALIDATING THE CONNECTION BETWEEN XXXX 2
XXXX XXXX XXXX there is some inaccurate information reporting. 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX These addresses do not belong to me : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX ca XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX This is the fraudulent account please only remove this account Details Account # XXXX Original Creditor - Company Sold - Account Type Credit Card - Revolving Terms Date Opened XX/XX/2019 Account Status Open Payment Status Current Status Updated XX/XX/2019 Usage 89 % Balance {$890.00} Balance Updated XX/XX/2019 Credit Limit {$1000.00} Monthly Payment {$35.00} Past Due Amount - Highest Balance {$890.00} Terms Revolving Responsibility Authorized User,Company has responded to the consumer and the CFPB and chooses not to provide a public response,Experian Information Solutions Inc.,OH,44146,,Consent provided,Web,2019-08-06,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,3331056 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX to have this reinstated in reporting within 24 hours.,,TD BANK US HOLDING COMPANY,MA,02115,,Consent provided,Web,2025-04-29,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,13243573 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX to XXXX : ATTORNEY FOR PLAINTIFF Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX City : XXXX XXXX : MD XXXX Code : XXXX If Person is Attorney : Attorney Code : XXXX Attorney 's Firm : LAW OFC JOHN E. LINDNER Name XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to Complaint : DEFENDANT Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX : XXXX State : MD XXXX Code : XXXX Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX to Complaint : WAGE GARNISHEE Address : ATTN : PAYROLL/HR Address : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX City : XXXX XXXX XXXX MD XXXX Code XXXX XXXX Name : XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX Connection to Complaint : PLAINTIFF Address XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
XXXX XXXX XXXX took away every single chance I ever had of a normal life. So you see 1

What this index shows

This is the master index of every company that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database, mirrored on PlainComplaint and grouped by institution so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that company across every product, state, and year since 2011. The CFPB began collecting consumer complaints when it was established under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 and has published them as a public dataset to give consumers, researchers, and journalists a window into how U.S. financial-services firms respond to customer concerns.

The default view is alphabetical by company name and paginated 50 companies per page. Use the sort controls to re-order by total complaint volume (highest first), timely-response percentage (best response track record first), or most recent complaint activity (companies with the freshest reports). Each row links to a dedicated company page showing year-over-year complaint trends, the top complaint products, complaint issues, top states by volume, and a year-by-year breakdown of complaint counts and response timeliness.

How to compare companies fairly

Raw complaint volume is a function of two things: how many customers the company serves, and how it handles those customers. A nationwide bank with tens of millions of accounts can show six-figure complaint counts simply because of its scale; a smaller regional lender with a few hundred complaints may actually have a higher per-customer complaint rate. The "Timely Response %" column shows the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline — a stronger comparable metric across firms of different sizes. Pair it with the volume column to form a fuller picture, and dig into the company page for the breakdown by product so you can see whether issues are concentrated in a single line of business (for example, credit reporting) or spread across the entire firm.

Complaint records are consumer-submitted narratives. The CFPB does not adjudicate or verify the facts in each report before publishing; companies are given the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve. Many complaints are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is in its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer financial category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said, regardless of the company's perspective. Treat individual records accordingly, and lean on aggregate patterns (top issues, year-over-year trends, state distribution) when drawing conclusions.

What the dataset covers

The CFPB Consumer Complaint Database covers complaints against banks, credit-card issuers, mortgage servicers, debt collectors, payday lenders, student-loan servicers, money-transfer companies, prepaid-card issuers, credit bureaus, auto-finance lenders, and other financial products and services regulated by the agency. Complaints are categorized by product (the broad financial-services category) and sub-product, and again by issue (the specific consumer concern, e.g. "incorrect information on your report") and sub-issue. Year-by-year coverage runs from 2011 to present, with monthly refreshes published by the CFPB.

PlainComplaint refreshes from the agency's public release on a regular cadence and re-derives all aggregate counts, rankings, and trend lines on each refresh, so the page you're reading reflects the latest snapshot of the public database. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, dedup rules, and the refresh schedule, or browse by other dimensions: issues, products, or states.