Total complaints
1
Filed since The
1 consumer complaints recorded in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, with breakdowns by product, state, and complaint year.
1 consumer complaints filed with the CFPB
This profile shows this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore's complaint history from CFPB public records. 1 consumers have filed complaints since The . The company has a 0% timely response rate and has provided relief in 0% of cases.
Total complaints
1
Filed since The
Timely response
0%
CFPB-tracked response window
Relief rate
0%
Closed with monetary or non-monetary relief
CFPB benchmark: response within 15 calendar days of filing.
Share closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
How this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore's 1 complaints split across CFPB product categories. Resolution rate badge = % closed with monetary or non-monetary relief.
| Product | Complaints |
|---|---|
| however she claims after multiple times they informed the tech team due to a backend upgrade | 1 |
| State | Complaints |
|---|---|
| WF is discriminating against me since we are just simply trying to transfer money to XXXX XXXX. This issue should be looked into more serious for more concerns of discrimination in my opinion. | 1 |
| Issue | Complaints |
|---|---|
| the supervisor clearly informed me that I am not the only person that has complained about this issue for global remittance. Since WF failed to take this action more serious | 1 |
Source: CFPB Consumer Complaint Database CFPB Consumer Complaint Database
this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore has accumulated 1 consumer complaint in the CFPB public database, with filings active across 1 U.S. state. Of those submissions, 1 includes a consumer narrative — the verbatim description of the reported problem that the CFPB collects alongside each filing. The earliest complaint on file dates back to The , and the most recent logged activity is The superv, giving this record a multi-year window of observable consumer sentiment.
Looking at response behavior, this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore reports a 0% timely-response rate and has closed 0% of cases with a written explanation to the consumer. 0% of complaints were closed with monetary or non-monetary relief — an outcome signal that tracks how often consumers walked away with some form of remediation. A further 0% of responses were formally disputed by the consumer after the company replied, a useful marker of resolution quality independent of sheer volume. The most-reported product category for this record is "however she claims after multiple times they informed the tech team due to a backend upgrade", and the single most common underlying issue is "the supervisor clearly informed me that I am not the only person that has complained about this issue for global remittance. Since WF failed to take this action more serious".
Complaint volume is heavily influenced by company size, customer base, and market footprint — larger financial institutions routinely carry more filings purely because they serve more consumers. A complaint is a consumer-reported allegation, not proven wrongdoing, and a timely or relief-flagged closure does not by itself confirm fault. Use this page as one input among many when evaluating this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore: cross-check against the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database directly, review your own contract terms, and consult a licensed professional for financial, legal, or regulatory advice. This page is informational only.
Learn more about your rights and how to interpret complaint data.
Explore additional financial data about companies, lenders, and institutions on our partner portals.
Disclaimer: This data is from CFPB public records. PlainComplaint does not provide financial advice. A complaint does not indicate that a company has violated any law or regulation. Complaint volumes are influenced by company size, customer base, and market presence. Use this data as one of many inputs when evaluating a company.
this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore has received 1 consumer complaints filed with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau.
this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore has a 0% timely response rate to CFPB complaints.
The most common issue reported against this is a discrimination case in my opinion as most people that send money outside of the USA are different national origin and potentially of different race. Therefore is "the supervisor clearly informed me that I am not the only person that has complained about this issue for global remittance. Since WF failed to take this action more serious" in the "however she claims after multiple times they informed the tech team due to a backend upgrade" product category.
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.