2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: W

Companies starting with W that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

8.9K companies starting with "W"

Showing 3.2K–3.2K of 8.9K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
which did not mention any restrictions regarding a minimum loan age or timeline. I can provide both the text message and the email with these recast terms 1
which did not occur. 2
which did not seem feasible to assume.,,JPMORGAN CHASE & CO.,NY,11375,,Consent provided,Web,2023-07-24,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,7297084 1
which did nothing to help when all said and done 4
which did work - thankfully ). I am hoping that you can help me get this resolved 1
which didnt happen+ Remedy : deletion account from all credit bureaus.,,ERC,CA,91803,,Consent provided,Web,2021-08-16,Closed with explanation,Yes,N/A,4635216 1
which differentiates balances with the same account numbers. This not only reflects negligence in verifying the accuracy of the information provided to you but also constitutes a clear violation of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ) 1
which directly affects my credit score and rating 6
which directly contradicts their reporting of the accounts as charge-offs. The second account was recently altered to remove the charge-off status and now reflects 120-day delinquencies 1
which directly harms my credibility as a borrower. 1
which directly impacts the legal validity of your reporting. 1
which directly violates the FDCPA and the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA 1
which directs customers to email support@credit.com ) and nonetheless Credit.com has failed to act in accordance with that revoked authorization. 1
which disallowed the 3-way call among the Chase Executive Office 1
which disappeared before I can even read it. Upon phone conversation with the closing Team 1
which disconnects after several minutes. 1
which displayed an available credit limit 1
which displayed numerous pop-ups and advertisements saying that ticket transfer and resale once tickets are received are as easy as a few button clicks. This conflicted with the information that the tickets would only be able to be picked up by the credit card holder at Will Call 1
which displays my name and the same address listed in all bank statements. File name : XXXX XXXX Driver License XXXX Copy of recent transactions from XXXX XXXX account ending in XXXX 1
which displays the same table stating there are no limits on wire request amounts by phone 1
which disputed XXXX XXXX ' claim that I voluntarily missed the international flight on XX/XX/XXXX. 1
which do not constitute lawful validation. 1
which do not fulfill the legal requirement for verification. 3
which do not include access without the consumer 's consent. 2
which do not include with precision that I paid my 3 accounts directly to them 1
which do not satisfy FCRA requirements or CFPB guidance for a reasonable investigationespecially where the integrity of the consumers identifiers has been compromised. 3
which do not work. And what's worse 1
which doctor it was for 1
which does n't hurt my case at all either. 1
which does not address their FCRA violation. As of today 1
which does not apply in my case ). In my situation 1
which does not constitute proof of authorization. 1
which does not constitute proper validation under the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). These responses amount to a refusal to conduct a reasonable investigation as required under 15 U.S.C. 1681i. 3
which does not even come close to compensating me for the hardship and damage to my credit reputation caused by HSBC misbehavior. 1
which does not even have an actual office and the office is actually occupied by a completely different and unrelated company. 2
which does not exist 2
which does not impact your credit score 1
which does not make sense since I was definitely on XXXX XXXX during that time. I asked the representative why XX/XX/XXXX 1
which does not meet my immediate need. My attempts to resolve this issue with the company were unsuccessful 1
which does not provide a private remedy. Thus 1
which does not reasonably justify the fee charged. These charges appear to be excessive and not properly disclosed as optional or negotiable. 1
which does not reflect the fact that services were never completed and that the contractor was operating illegally. 1
which does not satisfy the federal requirement to maintain and provide a full payment/interest record. 1
which does not satisfy the requirements for debt validation under the FDCPA. 1
which does not satisfy the requirements of 50 U.S.C. 3937. 1
which does not show on my husbands statement. We went to the bank and requested a copy 1
which does not specify that the auto-decline setting is limited to card purchases. 1
which does not support my forgiveness timeline This experience has been financially harmful and emotionally exhausting. I have honored my end of the contract for nearly 14 years 1
which dominate our communities. Im a professional 1
which easily could have applied to my mistaken autopay situation. The banker who processed the reversal request required me to provide both my account number and routing number. This makes no sense 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter W that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →