2026 data Public-data reference. official source

Companies: T

Companies starting with T that appear in the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, sorted by total complaint volume.

PlainComplaint home → About this data

13.5K companies starting with "T"

Showing 3.2K–3.2K of 13.5K

Sort by: Name Most Complaints Timely Response
Company Complaints
the customer service did not have an answer of it and wanted me to tranfer to the rewards department 1
the customer service phone reps did not want to help me & did not want to open up an investigation. Instead they told me to visit the branch in person the following day to speak with the manager. I attempted to open up an investigation with a total of about 8 different phone representatives from Citibank but they all denied the authority to be able to do so. So I presented myself first thing in the morning the following day on Monday 1
the customer service rep comes back on every XXXX minutes to make sure I want to stay on hold. It is torture. She couldn't actually do anything 1
the Customer Service rep suggested I speak with Saks 1
the customer service rep told me that the information I had provided was incorrect and they could not help me access my credit file. I was confused and asked if we could go over everything 1
the customer service rep was not able to help me and asked to submit new documentation. This has significant loss of time not counting towards PSLF 1
the customer service representative did not even send me a follow-up email regarding my case review. Instead 1
the customer service representative did not know what it was. Referred me to XXXX. 1
the customer service representative for Citis investigation team informed me that the investigation into the unauthorized transactions would be re-opened. During this call 1
the customer service representative indicated that a loss mitigation specialist would call back immediately ''. As expected 1
the customer service representative informed me that Chase no longer wanted to do business with [ me ] 1
the customer service representative said the amount does not need to be paid back 1
the customer service representative suddenly changed his mind and decide to open yet another dispute for this charge. I have been assured that this matter will be resolved within 30 days. However 1
the customer service representative would tell me they were authorized to do one and only one thing take payments. They refused to discuss the charges 1
the Customer service representatives canned responses and the dipsute teams canned responses.. This decision was made without proper investigation or consideration of the evidence I provided or have attempted to provide 1
the Customer Service representatives would acknowledgement that the loan servicing calculations with my mortgage had not been adjusted correctly 1
the customer service team has insisted on conducting further reviews and has denied the acceptability of my passport. 1
the customer verified his information and XXXX advised he did actually see that the customer made the authorization on XX/XX/XXXX 1
the customer was correctly charged for the damage to the first vehicle and for the failure to refuel both vehicles. '' This statement directly reinforces my position that I did not fuel the vehicle 1
the customer. 1
the customer. I am even more perplexed by the response due to the numerous calls I have had with Barclays representatives apologizing and assuring me that the dispute will finally be resolved. I understand that the failure to report to me that the dispute was unfounded 1
the cut off to pay online or via phone is XXXX. The XXXX came at XXXX too late to pay online. Exact same thing that happens every time. XXXX super upset 1
the cut-off date for this Remic was XX/XX/XXXX with a closing date of XX/XX/XXXX. Adding this alleged loan roughly 9 years latter ( XXXX ) would have made the entire Remic defective ( ultimately collapsing this REMIC ). As the XXXX identifies that moving this loan into this REMIC 9 years latter is impossible and totally unlawful.. 1
the daily reconciliaton process 1
the damage had already been done. 1
the damage is done for six months with XXXX and they should have to pay for this.,,LEXISNEXIS,AL,350XX,,Consent provided,Web,2023-08-03,Closed with non-monetary relief,Yes,N/A,7347371 1
the damage to my credit and financial situation had already occurred. 1
the data does not meet these criteria 7
the data furnisher is also obligated to investigate and correct any information found to be inaccurate. 2
the data furnisher verified the information to be accurate as reported. Please note that accurate information can not be deleted. A national consumer credit reporting agency stores information from credit grantors 3
the data in a consumer report must be verifiably accurate under the requirements of the Fair Credit Reporting Act ( FCRA ). Legal Consequences : Failure to verify information accurately can result in liability 1
the data lists my pre-populated name ; however 1
the data provided is not always accurate 3
the data reported on my credit file reflects contradictory delinquency dates and misclassified payment history that are impossible to reconcile as accurate. 1
the data we furnished in XX/XX/XXXX reflected your loans were XXXX days past due. 1
the data you would be seeing regarding upcoming and pending payments did not accurately reflect the status of your loans. These have not been isolated incidents ( misinformation from customer service and inaccuracies in the record keeping ) 1
the date 2
the date and reason for the alleged charge-off 1
the date I noticed my original request was cancelled. ( Exhibit XXXX ) XX/XX/XXXX 1
the date is was open is XX/XX/year> over XXXX XXXX XXXX 1
the date last active is inaccurate 5
the date last active is XX/XX/XXXX 1
the date last reported is incorrect. This is grounds for removal as well as my rights being violated under 15 USC 1681 section 602 A : I have a right to privacy. 15 USC 1681 Section 604 A Section 2 : a consumer reporting agency can not furnish an account without my written instructions. As well as taking more than 30 days to respond from my initial request for validation. This identity theft has resulted in loss of funds and lending. This identity theft process has taken longer than 245 days. 3
the date my Zelle payment shows it was initiated 1
the date of and basis for each charge. 1
the date of and basis for each charge. Please help me obtain this information that is due to me by law from the collection agency.,Company believes it acted appropriately as authorized by contract or law,TriVerity 1
the date of any such transfer 5
the date of bankruptcy discharge 2
the date of charge off. Ironically 2
the date of delinquency is inaccurate 1

About this letter-indexed view

This page lists every company beginning with the letter T that appears in the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) Consumer Complaint Database. The CFPB has accepted consumer complaints since 2011 and publishes them as a public dataset so consumers, journalists, and researchers can study patterns across the financial services industry. PlainComplaint mirrors that database and groups it by company so a single company page rolls up every complaint filed against that institution across every product, state, and complaint year.

Companies on this page are listed by name by default. You can switch the sort to "Most Complaints" to surface the highest-volume institutions starting with this letter, "Timely Response" to find companies with the strongest response track record, or "Most Recent" to see who has had complaints filed most recently. Each row links to a dedicated company page with year-over-year trends, the top complaint products, the issue categories driving volume, and a state-level breakdown showing where the company's customer base is filing the most reports.

How to interpret these numbers

Total complaint counts reflect raw volume — they do not control for a company's customer base size, market share, or product mix. A large nationwide bank can show six-figure complaint counts simply because it serves tens of millions of customers. A smaller regional lender with a low complaint count may still have a higher per-customer complaint rate. To compare companies fairly, look at "Timely Response %" alongside total volume: this measures the share of complaints the company answered within the CFPB's deadline. A high timely rate combined with a low consumer-disputed rate is a stronger signal of customer-service quality than raw count alone.

A complaint in this database is not a finding of wrongdoing. The CFPB does not verify the facts of each complaint before publishing it; complaints are consumer-submitted narratives. Companies have the opportunity to respond, dispute, or resolve each complaint, and many are resolved with monetary or non-monetary relief. The strength of the dataset is its scale — millions of records spanning every major U.S. consumer finance category — and its neutrality: it reports what consumers said happened, regardless of the company's perspective.

What you'll find on each company page

Each company detail page derives every statistic from the live PlainComplaint database. You'll see the company's total complaint volume since 2011, the timely-response rate, the breakdown by financial product (mortgages, credit cards, debt collection, credit reporting, and so on), the most common complaint issues filed against that company, the top states by complaint volume, and a year-over-year trend showing whether complaint volume is rising or falling. Where the database includes the company's most-recent assets or revenue, those values are shown so readers can compare complaint volume against firm size — context that raw counts alone cannot provide.

Companies are deduplicated where possible: subsidiaries are linked back to their parent organization, and shared identifiers from the CFPB are used to merge duplicate entries that appear under slightly different names. If you spot a company that should be merged with another, contact our editorial team — corrections are processed and reflected on the next dataset refresh.

Source & refresh cadence

All complaint records originate from the CFPB Consumer Complaint Database, downloaded from the agency's public data portal at consumerfinance.gov. We refresh the dataset on a regular cadence so the rankings, browse pages, and detail-page statistics stay aligned with the agency's latest public release. See the methodology page for the full data pipeline, deduplication rules, and refresh schedule. See the full company index for the alphabetical view across every letter, or jump to the rankings hub for live top-10 lists computed from the same database.

Related

Browse all → | Rankings →